 |
|
LAUTH INVESTIGATIONS INTERNATIONAL INC.
Indiana Office : 201 North Illinois Street, 16th Floor
South Tower, Indianapolis, IN 46204
(317) 951-1100
Colorado Office : 1550 Larimer Street, Suite 905
Denver, CO, 80202
(303) 900-8172
|
|
Who Protects the Whistleblowers?
By Indianapolis Private Investigator, Lauth Investigations International, Inc., November 21, 2011
We have all heard of whistleblowers, the individuals who come forward to publicly expose alleged
misconduct or illegal activities that occur in the work place. This can include public or private
organizations, corporations or government agencies. They blow the whistle on misconduct in the
workplace that is suspected to be a violation of law or regulation. This would be such things as:
fraud, bribery, violations of safety, theft and corruption. For those that come forward we have to
surmise that there are hundreds that do not. It has been estimated 30-40% stay quiet due to fear of
retaliation. When an individual makes allegations of wrongdoing within their work place to
leadership within their company or government entity, or externally to law enforcement, regulators
or media, they face uncertain futures. Frequently they face reprisal from within the agency they
are exposing. While some would classify whistleblowers as snitches, it is clear most are not making
accusations out of revenge, but a decision of morality and wanting to do good by exposing the
irresponsibility or unscrupulousness of those in leadership positions.
For instance, on November 22, 2011, the National Whistleblowers Center (NWC) issued a letter
to current United States Attorney General Eric Holder, requesting an independent investigation of
allegedly mishandling child sex abuse cases by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
Allegations state gross negligence and malfeasance resulting in botched investigations in 1998
through 2002, during former FBI Director Louis Freeh’s tenure and continuing into FBI Director,
Robert Mueller’s term at the FBI. The letter further asseverates former Attorney General John
Ashcroft, the Department of Justice (DOJ) and even the DOJ Inspector General failed to provide
responsible oversight and failed to investigate information provided by a highly decorated veteran
of the FBI, Jane Turner.
Recent international news headlines that Penn State is hiring former FBI Director Louis Freeh
to head up an internal investigation in the case of former assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky,
who was charged with 40 criminal counts and accused of sexually abusing eight boys. It has spurred
requests for further investigation into former FBI agent’s potential mishandling of other reports
involving children. The NWI letter to Holder
alleges gross negligence of children’s welfare,
botched investigations and extreme retaliation against former FBI agent Jane Turner when she made
pleas on behalf of the child victims that were ignored by her own agency. The letter further
discourages Penn State from utilizing tainted officials in their effort to responsibly investigate
the current allegations and charges against Sandusky.
Correspondence to other top government officials also state the FBI spent enormous resources
trying to discredit whistleblower, Jane Turner and points out despite a Minneapolis jury’s 2007
verdict finding the FBI guilty of retaliation and awarding Turner maximum compensation for damages,
Director Mueller promoted FBI officials personally involved in the case into high positions within
the agency after the verdict has been handed down.
Addressing the FBI’s efforts to discredit her, Turner stated, “What was stunning to me was
that my beloved FBI put me in a situation where I had to choose between the Bureau, which I loved,
and doing the right thing. It would have been simpler for everyone involved to address the
problems.” Instead efforts to discredit Turner included fabrication of a personality disorder,
receiving lower performance ratings than her male co-agents, full field investigations looking
for infractions and even a national security background check. None produced dirt on Turner.
Without warning, on February 6, 2001 Turner was escorted from the building she was assigned and
placed on administrative leave pending a Fitness for Duty Evaluation and told by a Special Agent
in Charge, “You’ve had a wonderful career but it’s over.” Though eventually returning to work and
reassigned during the 9/11 investigation, Turner exposed theft of items recovered from the ruins
of the World Trade Center by the FBI’s own recovery team. This resulted in her second but final
suspension. Turner joins approximately 12 other agents who are now classified ‘whistleblowers’,
who have come forward to expose wrongdoings within the government agency and DOJ in the last
decade.
Just as Turner has faced retaliation from government officials, whistleblowers in the corporate
world fear similar reprisal. Without doubt, fear of retribution for doing the right thing has
discouraged many from coming forward. However, new monetary incentives and efforts made by
countries throughout the world to strengthen protection for whistleblowers may help when one
faces a decision that could end a career, or worse.
In 2006, fraud investigator, Harry Markapolos, followed his gut instinct and repeatedly tipped
off the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that he suspected that Bernard “Barry” Madoff
of securities fraud. It resulted in exposing the most costly and elaborates Ponzi scheme in history.
Markopolos’s suspicions resulted in Madoff’s 2008 arrest and eventual plead guilty to 11 federal
crimes, including fraud. Federal prosecutors estimated the Wall Street giant schemed approximately
$64.8 billion missing from investor’s accounts. On June 29, 2009, Madoff was sentenced to 150 years
in prison but it is unlikely he was the only individual or corporate entity who benefited from the
fraudulent activity.
Since the global financial crisis, the Dodd-Frank Act went into effect in August 2011, which
offers whistleblowers stronger protection from employer reprisals. This will be administered by the
Securities and Exchange Commission; the tipster (whistleblower) can receive up to 30% of awards
in their tip-offs. The new incentives were designed to encourage more individuals to report
suspected wrongdoing and reduce their fear of retaliation from their employers.
In addition, many advocacy groups such as the National Whistleblowers Center (NWC), attorneys
and private investigators, referred to as fraud detectives, are willing to provide assistance to
whistleblowers to assure them they will be well protected. They will assist the whistleblower with
how to have well documented claims, the collection of appropriate information and documents, and to
make sure the information and documents will be reported to the appropriate authorities and an
investigation will be conducted. They also will assure proper legal representation.
Markopolos has personally elected to talk openly about his experience and has become a somewhat
celebrated whistleblower, a role model for do-gooders and touted as a man who wants to make a career
out of “digging up skeletons, one at a time.”
Though payouts have been around for years, it is expected that formal programs offering legal
protection and financial incentives to whistleblowers will both increase the quantity and quality
of information to help combat corruption in the workplace, whether it is a government or a private
company. With the support from others who have shed their anonymity and gone public, along with
those wishing to help protect whistleblower rights, even without financial incentives, more people
will feel less threatened before making the decision to come forward. In addition, improvements on
protective programs should greatly discourage any official or employer from bullying someone who
is trying to expose corruption or “cooking the books” as they say. Anyone in a leadership position
who elects to take advantage of the system or innocent people, need to remember that it only takes
the courage of one individual to take down an empire!
NWC Letter to Attorney General Eric Holder (November 22, 2011) Request for Investigation
NWC Letter to Penn State (November 22, 2011)
Letter to Attorney General John Ashcroft (August 26, 2003) Request for Referral and Investigation
Formal Complaint Under FBI Whistleblower Regulations (October 20, 2002)
Letter to FBI Director (October 11, 2002) Crimes Against Children: Additional Evidence
Letter to FBI Director (October 9, 2002) Crimes Against Children: FBI Whistleblower Disclosure
Honesty Without Fear - Jane Turner: Meet the Whistleblower
FBI Whistleblower’s Court Award Tops $1.3 Million Damagaes (Press Release)
Author - Kym L. Pasqualini
Founder, National Center for Missing Adults
Lauth Investigations International, Inc.
201 N. Illinois St., 16th Fl.-South Tower
Indianapolis, IN 46204
Please contact Indianapolis Private Investigator, Thomas Lauth, for any investigations needed at 800.889.3463 or visit www.lauthinvestigations.com
|
 |